3 minutes: Session goals, what you will learn, materials check.
Engagement: Quick show of hands confidence poll. Pair up with a neighbor for later activities.
7 minutes: Threat snapshot for secondary classrooms
Engagement: Think-pair-share on where risks appear in your class.
Process tactics: One minute individual note, one minute partner share, one minute whole room capture on a slide with QR code.
10 minutes: Activity 1: Phishing analysis protocol
In pairs, examine two sample emails, highlight red flags, and decide whether to report or ignore using a short rubric.
Process tactics: Device-based or printed cards, timer visible, facilitator circulates and prompts, quick stand and share of one finding per table.
Product: Completed phishing checklist and a one-sentence justification.
10 minutes: Activity 2: Privacy policy mini audit
How to skim a tool policy for student privacy and data practices.
Engagement: Triads locate eight items in a short policy excerpt: data collected, purpose, student age and consent, retention, third-party sharing, security controls, deletion process, and privacy contact. Decide if the tool is classroom-ready.
10 minutes: Activity 3: Routine builder for grades 6 to 12
Content: Simple cyber hygiene routines that fit normal class flow.
Engagement: Individuals draft two routines using a scaffolded checklist. Examples include login and logout, password and multi-factor authentication check, device locking when unattended, and safer network use.
Process tactics: Template with prompts for teacher moves, student steps, timing, and reinforcement cues. Peer swap for a thirty-second friendly critique.
Product: Two routine drafts ready to post or teach.
10 minutes: Activity 4: Micro teach and feedback
How to introduce and reinforce a routine quickly.
Engagement: Partners
Process: timed peer-to-peer rotation at tables and then share one effective phrase.
Product: Revised script for one routine
6 minutes: One-week rollout plan
Planning for real classrooms with constraints.
Complete a one-page plan that lists objectives, materials, low-bandwidth adaptations, inclusion supports, and two formative checks, such as an exit ticket and a short scenario quiz.
Process: Individual or Partner
Product: One week implementation plan plus a short parent message draft.
4 minutes: Closing and Q&A
Total time: 60 minutes
Detect common phishing attempts by naming at least five indicators and explaining the risk for each (urgent tone, mismatched URL on hover, spoofed domain, unexpected attachment, request for credentials, generic greeting, grammar anomalies).
Design two cyber hygiene routines for grades 6 to 12 that specify teacher moves, student steps, timing, and reinforcement cues. Examples include login and logout, password and multi-factor authentication check, device locking when unattended, and safer network use.
Align routines with basic privacy expectations by mapping each step to local expectations such as using district vetted tools, protecting student identifiers, and avoiding credential sharing, documented on a one-page checklist.
Childers, G., Linsky, C. L., Payne, B. R., Byers, J., & Baker, D. (2023). K-12 educators’ self-confidence in designing and implementing cybersecurity lessons. Computers & Education Open, 4, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2022.100119
Common Sense Media. (n.d.). Common Sense Privacy Program. https://privacy.commonsense.org/
Consortium for School Networking. (2024, April 30). Cybersecurity remains K–12 EdTech leaders’ No. 1 priority in 2024. https://www.cosn.org/cosn-news/cybersecurity-remains-k-12-edtech-leaders-no-1-priority-in-2024/
G. Hossain, “CyberSkiller: An Online Training System for Elevating Cybersecurity Basic Skills for STEM Undergraduates through Up-Skilling and Re-Skilling,” in Engineering Education and Instructional Technologies Conf., Qatar, 2024.
Ibrahim, A., McKee, M., Sikos, L. F., & Johnson, N. F. (2024). A systematic review of K-12 cybersecurity education around the world. IEEE Access, 12, 59726–59738. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3393425
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency. (n.d.). Protecting our future: Cybersecurity for K–12 schools. U.S. Department of Homeland Security. https://www.cisa.gov/topics/cybersecurity-best-practices/K12cybersecurity/protecting-our-future-cybersecurity-k12
National Institute of Standards and Technology. (2024, February 26). The NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) 2.0 (CSWP 29). https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.CSWP.29
U.S. Department of Education, Student Privacy Policy Office. (n.d.). Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA). https://studentprivacy.ed.gov/ferpa
Minimum: Web browser + Wi-Fi; ability to open QR/short URLs. No special software.
Why required: Live phishing analysis, privacy-policy mini-audit, collaborative routine templates, and micro-teach feedback tools are all device-based.
Back
Trips and Tours