Change display time — Currently: Central Daylight Time (CDT) (Event time)

Empowering All Learners: Integrating Computational Thinking and AI for Inclusive Problem-Solving

,
Grand Hyatt - Texas Ballroom E

Innovator Talk
Blended Content
Save to My Favorites

Session description

In this session, presenters and participants will learn to design lessons that incorporate computational thinking by solving the CT problem: How do we create lessons that are relevant to the content we teach and engage all students in computational thinking practices? AI will enhance lesson planning and support student learning.

Outline

1. Brief Introduction to Computational Thinking (5 minutes)
- Content: Overview of the four cornerstones: decomposition, pattern recognition, abstraction, and algorithms.
- Engagement: Quick introduction, framing computational thinking’s role in lesson design.
- Process: Use slides with key definitions and examples to help participants understand the core components of computational thinking.

2. Introduction of the Computational Thinking Problem (5 minutes)
- Problem: How do we design lessons that are relevant to the content we teach and engage all students in computational thinking practices?
- Content: Present the problem and explain how it relates to participants’ teaching contexts, encouraging them to consider how computational thinking can be integrated across subjects.
- Engagement: Participants reflect on their current lesson designs and share initial thoughts on integrating computational thinking.
Process: Brief discussion with the group to identify common challenges.

3. Decomposition of the Problem (10 minutes)
- Content: Guide participants in breaking down the problem into manageable parts (e.g., content relevance, student engagement, integrating computational thinking).
- Engagement: Small groups work together to decompose the problem, identifying essential elements for designing lessons that incorporate computational thinking.
- Process: Participants collaborate in small groups to decompose the problem and share their ideas with the larger group.

4. Data Analysis and Pattern Recognition (20 minutes)
- Content: Participants will sort through a set of 10 computational thinking lessons and categorize them according to the four computational thinking pillars: decomposition, pattern recognition, abstraction, and algorithms.
- Engagement: Hands-on activity where groups analyze the language and activities in each lesson to identify patterns in how each computational thinking component is taught.
- Process: Each group categorizes the lessons, identifies patterns in how each pillar is addressed, and discusses their findings. Group representatives then share insights with the whole room in a brief discussion.

5. Development of an Algorithm (10 minutes)
- Content: Based on the identified patterns, participants develop a simple algorithm or step-by-step plan to create lessons that integrate computational thinking pillars effectively.
- Engagement: Groups work together to outline a process for designing computational thinking lessons using the patterns they identified.
- Process: Groups create their algorithms, share them with the larger group, and receive feedback on their approaches.

6. Leveraging AI for Lesson Design (5 minutes)
- Content: Discuss how AI can support the creation of computational thinking lessons, showing how AI tools can help design engaging lessons or generate new ideas.
- Engagement: A quick demonstration of AI tools like ChatGPT or AI-driven lesson planning software.
- Process: Demonstration followed by a brief discussion on the role of AI in lesson design and how it can complement computational thinking practices.

7. Review of Resources & Q&A (5 minutes)
- Content: Provide participants with resources to explore computational thinking and AI further.
- Engagement: Open floor for final questions and a quick review of key resources shared during the session.
- Process: Distribute resources and address any remaining questions from participants.

More [+]

Supporting research

- ISTE Standards - Computational Thinking
- Choi, S., Jang, Y., & Kim, K. (2023), Influence of pedagogical beliefs and perceived trust on teachers’ acceptance of educational artificial intelligence tools. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 39(4), 910–922. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2022.2049145
- Bryant, J., Heitz, C., Sanghvi, S., & Wagle, D. (2020). How artificial intelligence will impact K-12 teachers. McKinsey. https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/education/our-insights/how-artificial-intelligence-will-impact-k-12-teachers

More [+]

Presenters

Photo
Director of Curriculum and Instruction
Trinity Area School District
Photo
Director of Technology & Innovation
Trinity Area School District

Session specifications

Topic:

Computer Science and Computational Thinking

Grade level:

PK-12

Audience:

School Level Leadership, Teacher Development, Teacher

Attendee devices:

Devices required

Attendee device specification:

Smartphone: Android, iOS, Windows
Laptop: Chromebook, Mac, PC
Tablet: Android, iOS, Windows

Participant accounts, software and other materials:

Web browser such as Chrome.

Subject area:

Interdisciplinary (STEM/STEAM), Elementary/Multiple Subjects

ISTE Standards:

For Educators:
Designer
  • Use technology to create, adapt and personalize learning experiences that foster independent learning and accommodate learner differences and needs.
For Students:
Computational Thinker
  • Formulate problem definitions suited for technology-assisted methods such as data analysis, abstract models and algorithmic thinking in exploring and finding solutions.