Change display time — Currently: Central Daylight Time (CDT) (Event time)

Reimagining Student Discipline in Schools

,
HBGCC - 304A

Interactive Session
ASCD Annual Content
Save to My Favorites

Session description

Exlcusionary discipline does not positively influence students or communities at large. Research indicates the negative effects of exclusionary discipline from drop-outs to the school-to-prison pipeline. This session will focus on Restorative Progressive Discipline, a holistic approach to supporting students based on 5 principles. The goal of this session is for participants to learn, discuss and utilize discipline through a unique lens to more intentionally support students. Session Content: Introduction Restorative Progressive Discipline Overview of Principles Discussion & Recommendations

Outline

Session Content:

Introduction/Icebreaker (10 minutes)

Research on Exclusionary Discipline (5 minutes)

Overview of the School District of Philadelphia Discipline Team and Process (10 minutes)

Restorative Progressive Discipline (20 minutes)
- Principle 1: De-escalation is the first priority.
- Principle 2. The adult’s response impacts the
student’s response.
- Principle 3: Mending harm and restoring
relationships are the goals.
- Principle 4: Discipline requires instruction and
intervention.
- Principle 5: Intensive needs require specialized
support.

Small Group Discussions (20 minutes)

Recommendations (15 minutes)

Questions & Answer (10 minutes)

More [+]

Supporting research

Cornell, D., Gregory, A., Huang, F., & Fan, X. (2013). Perceived prevalence of teasing and bullying predicts high school dropout rates. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(1), 138–149.

Gray, A., Sirinides, P., Fink, R., Flack, A., DuBois, T., Morrison, K., & Hill, K. (2017). Discipline
in context: suspension, climate, and PBIS in the School District of Philadelphia. Research Report (#RR 2017–4). Consortium for Policy Research in Education, University of Pennsylvania. Retrieved from https://repository.upenn.edu/cpre_researchreports/106

Hendron, M., & Kearney, C. A. (2016). School climate and student absenteeism and internalizing and externalizing behavioral problems. Children & Schools, 38(2), 109-116.

LiCalsi, C., Osher, D., & Bailey, P. (2021). An empirical examination of the effects of suspension and suspension severity on behavioral and academic outcomes.

Losen, D. J., & Martinez, T. E. (2013). Out of school and off track: The overuse of suspensions in American middle and high schools. Civil Rights Project/Proyecto Derechos Civiles.

Losen, D.J., Ee, J., Hodson, C., and Martinez, T.E. (2015). Disturbing inequalities: Exploring the relationship between racial disparities in special education identification and discipline. In D. Losen (Ed), Closing the school discipline gap: Equitable remedies for excessive exclusion (pp. 89-106). New York: Teachers College Press.

McKinney, S. (2013). Truancy: A research brief. New York, NY: Vera Institute of Justice, Status Offense Resource Center.

Noltemeyer, A. L., Ward, R. M., & Mcloughlin, C. (2015). Relationship between school suspension and student outcomes: A meta-analysis. School Psychology Review, 44(2), 224-240.

Rosenbaum, J. (2018). Educational and criminal justice outcomes 12 years after school suspension. Youth & Society.

Skiba, R. J., Arredondo, M. I., & Rausch, M. K. (2014). New and developing research on disparities in discipline. Bloomington, IN: The Equity Project at Indiana University. Available at http://rtpcollaborative.indiana.edu/briefing-papers/

More [+]

Presenters

Photo
Restorative Discipline Liaison
School District of Philadelphia
Photo
Director, Student Discipline
School District of Philadelphia

Session specifications

Topic:

Academic and Behavioral Interventions

Grade level:

PK-12

Audience:

School Level Leadership, Teacher, Counselor

Attendee devices:

Devices not needed

Subject area:

Other: Please specify